|
|||
|
|
WHILE OUPs preoccupation with standardized orthography can be traced back to Fells day, it was left largely to the Presss seven-year-long apprentice systemduring which time a compositor or reader would be immersed in the intricacies of Oxford style, and introduced to the small clique of redoubtable specialiststo absorb the accumulated knowledge required by the job. Those charged with correcting the work of scholars traditionally held a position of great esteem in academic and editorial circles: the elder DIsraeli described such men by saying, ‘it became the glory of the learned to be correctors of the press to eminent printers. One such reader in Harts day, J. C. Pembery—a reader for 70 years, who corrected Max Müller's Sanskrit even though he knew no word of the language—already held a formidable reputation in the learned world. Soon OUP were able to set texts in everything from Aramaic to Zend: hieroglyphics, Minoan, Sanskrit, Syriac, Sinhalese, Tamil, Gothic, Icelandic, Runic, Himyaritic, Lombardic, Phoenician, Tibetan, Etruscan, Kanarese, and Telugu are just some of the many writing forms available for print. However, the expansion and reorganization Hart was charged with superintending demanded that the existing slow, traditional process of indoctrination and edification be standardized and streamlined. So it became part of Harts modernizing of the Press that he began to compile and draw up guidelines for the Presss compositors and readers. Hart had been greatly interested in the subject since his own days as an indentured proofreader, and his list of rules—begun a decade earlier, and even by 1893 still fitting onto a single broadsheet (click for a pop-up image (185k)—would form the basis for the first of his Rules for Compositors and Readers at the University Press, Oxford. (Excerpts of the preceding
text may be found on Oxford University Presss AskOxford
website.)
The original editions preliminary matter sometimes reprinted prefaces and notes from earlier editions. Here, however, for the sake of clarity and concision, prefaces and notes are not repeated in subsequent editions, but rather highlighted with a link to the edition in which they first appeared; once you have followed the link, click on your browser Back button to return to your starting place, or use the linear links at the bottom of each page. Images from previous editions have been reduced in size for ease of downloading. Those with either broadband access or supreme patience can contact me for higher-resolution (300 dpi) versions. I have not normalized
the punctuation in the original texts; any marginal comments of my own
are made in square brackets. To differentiate further the previously
published text from other copy, it is displayed fully justifiedin
other words, aligned on both left and right margins. While the original
uniformly has paragraphs set close-up with indents, in the interests
of clarity I have adopted the usual Web convention of separating paragraphs
with a line space. Editions and impressions of Hart’s Rules, 18932000
Webmaster:
R. M. Ritter © 2000-2002, Revised: 22/03/20020000000
Copyright
& Disclaimer (pop-up window)
|
||